<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comparisons on BitSpeed.org</title>
    <link>https://bitspeed.org/tags/comparisons/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Comparisons on BitSpeed.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://bitspeed.org/tags/comparisons/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>BitSpeed Inspect vs curl Timing Output, and When to Use Each</title>
      <link>https://bitspeed.org/bitspeed-inspect-vs-curl-timing-output-and-when-to-use-each/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://bitspeed.org/bitspeed-inspect-vs-curl-timing-output-and-when-to-use-each/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;ve ever debugged a slow endpoint, you&amp;rsquo;ve probably typed something like this:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;highlight&#34;&gt;&lt;pre tabindex=&#34;0&#34; style=&#34;color:#f8f8f2;background-color:#272822;-moz-tab-size:4;-o-tab-size:4;tab-size:4;&#34;&gt;&lt;code class=&#34;language-sh&#34; data-lang=&#34;sh&#34;&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;curl -o /dev/null -s -w &lt;span style=&#34;color:#e6db74&#34;&gt;&amp;#39;dns %{time_namelookup} connect %{time_connect} tls %{time_appconnect} ttfb %{time_starttransfer} total %{time_total}\n&amp;#39;&lt;/span&gt; https://example.org/&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a good habit. curl is on nearly every machine, it uses the same kind of connection events Inspect records, and for &amp;ldquo;is this slow right now, and roughly where&amp;rdquo; it&amp;rsquo;s often all you need. So why use anything else?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://bitspeed.org/images/inspect-vs-curl.svg&#34; alt=&#34;curl prints cumulative timings for one request; Inspect saves many samples, names intervals and compares runs.&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BitSpeed Transfer vs rsync and rclone for Moving One Large File</title>
      <link>https://bitspeed.org/bitspeed-transfer-vs-rsync-and-rclone-for-moving-one-large-file/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://bitspeed.org/bitspeed-transfer-vs-rsync-and-rclone-for-moving-one-large-file/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;rsquo;ve got a big file to move, a VM image or a database dump or a video master, and a link you don&amp;rsquo;t fully trust. The usual answers are rsync and rclone, and they&amp;rsquo;re good answers. BitSpeed Transfer covers a narrower case. Here&amp;rsquo;s how to tell which one you&amp;rsquo;re in.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Short version: pick by where the file is going. rsync is for machines you reach over SSH. rclone is for cloud storage. Transfer is for one large file going to a receiver you run yourself, when you need proof at the end that it arrived whole.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
